<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nanny-state mandate? No way!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://janetsjournalblog.com/2008/08/20/nanny-state-mandate-no-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://janetsjournalblog.com/2008/08/20/nanny-state-mandate-no-way/</link>
	<description>Eye-opening news from America's leading advocate for children's vision.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 03:38:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: No deal. Final rule flawed. &#171; Janet&#8217;s Journal, a Vision First blog</title>
		<link>http://janetsjournalblog.com/2008/08/20/nanny-state-mandate-no-way/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[No deal. Final rule flawed. &#171; Janet&#8217;s Journal, a Vision First blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visionfirstfoundation.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Nanny state mandate? No way! August 20, 2008  The Chicago Tribune was in the dark about Illinois&#8217; new eye exam law&#8230; until I turned the light on!    Check out this great video on a convergence insufficiency: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nanny state mandate? No way! August 20, 2008  The Chicago Tribune was in the dark about Illinois&#8217; new eye exam law&#8230; until I turned the light on!    Check out this great video on a convergence insufficiency: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Here&#8217;s the deal&#8230; &#8220;Illinois&#8221; Hold&#8217;em style! &#171; Janet&#8217;s Journal, a Vision First blog</title>
		<link>http://janetsjournalblog.com/2008/08/20/nanny-state-mandate-no-way/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the deal&#8230; &#8220;Illinois&#8221; Hold&#8217;em style! &#171; Janet&#8217;s Journal, a Vision First blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 04:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visionfirstfoundation.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Nanny state mandate? No way! August 20, 2008  The Chicago Tribune was in the dark about Illinois&#8217; new eye exam law&#8230;until I turned the light on! This is my favorite post. Can you tell I had a lot of fun writing this one? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nanny state mandate? No way! August 20, 2008  The Chicago Tribune was in the dark about Illinois&#8217; new eye exam law&#8230;until I turned the light on! This is my favorite post. Can you tell I had a lot of fun writing this one? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Here&#8217;s the deal&#8230; &#8220;Illinois&#8221; Hold &#8216;em style! &#171; Janet&#8217;s Journal, a Vision First blog</title>
		<link>http://janetsjournalblog.com/2008/08/20/nanny-state-mandate-no-way/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the deal&#8230; &#8220;Illinois&#8221; Hold &#8216;em style! &#171; Janet&#8217;s Journal, a Vision First blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 06:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visionfirstfoundation.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Nanny state mandate? No way! August 20, 2008  The Chicago Tribune was in the dark about Illinois&#8217; new eye exam law&#8230;until I turned the light on! This is my favorite post. Can you tell I had a lot of fun writing this one? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nanny state mandate? No way! August 20, 2008  The Chicago Tribune was in the dark about Illinois&#8217; new eye exam law&#8230;until I turned the light on! This is my favorite post. Can you tell I had a lot of fun writing this one? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vision First form rejected? Doctors win. Children lose. &#171; Janet&#8217;s Journal, a Vision First blog</title>
		<link>http://janetsjournalblog.com/2008/08/20/nanny-state-mandate-no-way/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vision First form rejected? Doctors win. Children lose. &#171; Janet&#8217;s Journal, a Vision First blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visionfirstfoundation.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Nanny state mandate? No way! August 20, 2008  The Chicago Tribune was in the dark about Illinois&#8217; new eye exam law&#8230;until I turned the light on! This is my favorite post. Can you tell I had a lot of fun writing this one? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nanny state mandate? No way! August 20, 2008  The Chicago Tribune was in the dark about Illinois&#8217; new eye exam law&#8230;until I turned the light on! This is my favorite post. Can you tell I had a lot of fun writing this one? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet&#8217;s Top Posts 2008 &#171; Janet&#8217;s Journal, a Vision First blog</title>
		<link>http://janetsjournalblog.com/2008/08/20/nanny-state-mandate-no-way/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janet&#8217;s Top Posts 2008 &#171; Janet&#8217;s Journal, a Vision First blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visionfirstfoundation.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Nanny state mandate? No way!   August 20, 2008 The Chicago Tribune was in the dark about Illinois&#8217; new eye exam law&#8230;until I turned the light on! This is my favorite post. Can you tell I had a lot of fun writing this one? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nanny state mandate? No way!   August 20, 2008 The Chicago Tribune was in the dark about Illinois&#8217; new eye exam law&#8230;until I turned the light on! This is my favorite post. Can you tell I had a lot of fun writing this one? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Floyd Mizener</title>
		<link>http://janetsjournalblog.com/2008/08/20/nanny-state-mandate-no-way/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Floyd Mizener]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visionfirstfoundation.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The final resolve is very clear.  No more vision screenings in the schools.  Save the state money.  Give the money back to the taxpayers and parents.  Have them follow &quot;Amy&#039;s Law&quot; and the new eye exam law for children entering school.

There is no more need of having vision screeners in the schools, than there would be having health and dental screeners in the schools.  Imagine screeners trying to make a decision to refer or not refer to the dentist or physician.  

The protests of the parents and teachers have been heard and will have 100% assurance their children and students will be the best they can be to learn and see.  Now they should go directly to the eye doctor.  No complications and less costly in many ways.

Thank God that the collective assembling of parents and teachers taking action with the legislators has resolved this long negative to our children&#039;s visual welfare in the State of Illinois.

Floyd Mizener, OD, DOS, PhD]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The final resolve is very clear.  No more vision screenings in the schools.  Save the state money.  Give the money back to the taxpayers and parents.  Have them follow &#8220;Amy&#8217;s Law&#8221; and the new eye exam law for children entering school.</p>
<p>There is no more need of having vision screeners in the schools, than there would be having health and dental screeners in the schools.  Imagine screeners trying to make a decision to refer or not refer to the dentist or physician.  </p>
<p>The protests of the parents and teachers have been heard and will have 100% assurance their children and students will be the best they can be to learn and see.  Now they should go directly to the eye doctor.  No complications and less costly in many ways.</p>
<p>Thank God that the collective assembling of parents and teachers taking action with the legislators has resolved this long negative to our children&#8217;s visual welfare in the State of Illinois.</p>
<p>Floyd Mizener, OD, DOS, PhD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://janetsjournalblog.com/2008/08/20/nanny-state-mandate-no-way/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visionfirstfoundation.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why all the controversy about trying to make sure our children have proper vision?  Taxpayers may be able to save money on the children that we are paying for ADHD medication when there is really a vision problem.  Glasses and an eye exam is much cheaper!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why all the controversy about trying to make sure our children have proper vision?  Taxpayers may be able to save money on the children that we are paying for ADHD medication when there is really a vision problem.  Glasses and an eye exam is much cheaper!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

